These are the questions Compass asks for this practice, and the levels it scores you against.
Structured what / where / when / how-many problem statement.
When a significant quality problem occurs, how formally is the problem described before investigation starts?
Level 1 → 5World class at level 4
- We jump straight to fixing — no formal description
- Verbal description shared with the team
- Written problem statement, sometimes
- Structured problem statement: what, where, when, how manyWorld class
- Is/Is-Not analysis completed before root cause work begins
Stop the bleeding before investigating root cause.
When a defect escapes or is discovered, how quickly do you contain the risk?
Level 1 → 5World class at level 4
- No formal containment — we investigate while product flows
- Informal sorting or hold of suspect stock
- Written containment action with responsible person
- Formal containment plan with verification that defective product is stoppedWorld class
- Automated containment triggered by SPC out-of-control signal or ANDON
5-Why, Ishikawa, or data-driven root cause verification.
What method do you use to find the root cause of quality problems?
Level 1 → 5World class at level 4
- We rely on gut feel or experience
- Informal discussion — we agree on a likely cause
- 5-Why analysis, sometimes documented
- Structured 5-Why or Ishikawa diagram, verified against dataWorld class
- Root cause verified by experiment or data before corrective action
Systemic change, not just fix-it-once.
How do you ensure a quality problem cannot recur after it has been fixed?
Level 1 → 5World class at level 4
- We fix the immediate issue only
- Informal communication to operators about what to watch for
- Update work instructions or inspection criteria
- Systemic change: update PFMEA, control plan, and similar processesWorld class
- Lesson learned formally shared across all similar processes and sites